gcc/0149-LoongArch-Remove-masking-process-for-operand-3-of-xv.patch

86 lines
3.3 KiB
Diff
Raw Normal View History

From 0dba1a1daef3f043235382f0e8f107313b9bde07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chenghui Pan <panchenghui@loongson.cn>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 09:26:54 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 149/188] LoongArch: Remove masking process for operand 3 of
xvpermi.q.
The behavior of non-zero unused bits in xvpermi.q instruction's
third operand is undefined on LoongArch, according to our
discussion (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83540),
we think that keeping original insn operand as unmodified
state is better solution.
This patch partially reverts 7b158e036a95b1ab40793dd53bed7dbd770ffdaf.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/loongarch/lasx.md (lasx_xvpermi_q_<LASX:mode>):
Remove masking of operand 3.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/loongarch/vector/lasx/lasx-xvpermi_q.c:
Reposition operand 3's value into instruction's defined accept range.
---
gcc/config/loongarch/lasx.md | 5 -----
.../gcc.target/loongarch/vector/lasx/lasx-xvpermi_q.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/lasx.md b/gcc/config/loongarch/lasx.md
index 38f35bad6..f3b5ea373 100644
--- a/gcc/config/loongarch/lasx.md
+++ b/gcc/config/loongarch/lasx.md
@@ -640,8 +640,6 @@
(set_attr "mode" "<MODE>")])
;; xvpermi.q
-;; Unused bits in operands[3] need be set to 0 to avoid
-;; causing undefined behavior on LA464.
(define_insn "lasx_xvpermi_q_<LASX:mode>"
[(set (match_operand:LASX 0 "register_operand" "=f")
(unspec:LASX
@@ -651,9 +649,6 @@
UNSPEC_LASX_XVPERMI_Q))]
"ISA_HAS_LASX"
{
- int mask = 0x33;
- mask &= INTVAL (operands[3]);
- operands[3] = GEN_INT (mask);
return "xvpermi.q\t%u0,%u2,%3";
}
[(set_attr "type" "simd_splat")
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/vector/lasx/lasx-xvpermi_q.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/vector/lasx/lasx-xvpermi_q.c
index dbc29d2fb..f89dfc311 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/vector/lasx/lasx-xvpermi_q.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/vector/lasx/lasx-xvpermi_q.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ main ()
*((unsigned long*)& __m256i_result[2]) = 0x7fff7fff7fff0000;
*((unsigned long*)& __m256i_result[1]) = 0x7fe37fe3001d001d;
*((unsigned long*)& __m256i_result[0]) = 0x7fff7fff7fff0000;
- __m256i_out = __lasx_xvpermi_q (__m256i_op0, __m256i_op1, 0x2a);
+ __m256i_out = __lasx_xvpermi_q (__m256i_op0, __m256i_op1, 0x22);
ASSERTEQ_64 (__LINE__, __m256i_result, __m256i_out);
*((unsigned long*)& __m256i_op0[3]) = 0x0000000000000000;
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ main ()
*((unsigned long*)& __m256i_result[2]) = 0x000000000019001c;
*((unsigned long*)& __m256i_result[1]) = 0x0000000000000000;
*((unsigned long*)& __m256i_result[0]) = 0x00000000000001fe;
- __m256i_out = __lasx_xvpermi_q (__m256i_op0, __m256i_op1, 0xb9);
+ __m256i_out = __lasx_xvpermi_q (__m256i_op0, __m256i_op1, 0x31);
ASSERTEQ_64 (__LINE__, __m256i_result, __m256i_out);
*((unsigned long*)& __m256i_op0[3]) = 0x00ff00ff00ff00ff;
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ main ()
*((unsigned long*)& __m256i_result[2]) = 0xffff0000ffff0000;
*((unsigned long*)& __m256i_result[1]) = 0x00ff00ff00ff00ff;
*((unsigned long*)& __m256i_result[0]) = 0x00ff00ff00ff00ff;
- __m256i_out = __lasx_xvpermi_q (__m256i_op0, __m256i_op1, 0xca);
+ __m256i_out = __lasx_xvpermi_q (__m256i_op0, __m256i_op1, 0x02);
ASSERTEQ_64 (__LINE__, __m256i_result, __m256i_out);
return 0;
--
2.43.0